Thursday, February 24, 2011

On Crap

File this one under Actually Library Related, For Once, and Not About Children's Books.

And now I'm going to start a post with "Have you ever noticed...?" just like some damn comedian. Some damn lazy comedian, who always follows that phrase up with something banal. Banal and self-promoting, because the point is that everyone has noticed that the waiter who takes your order is not the one who brings your food anymore but they've never realized it was funny until Jerry Seinfeld pointed it out to them. And not even then.

Although I think Carlin invented that trope, and I'll give Carlin a pass. You've got to admit that, even after all these years, their stuff is shit and your shit is stuff.


So... have you ever noticed... that men read crap? I mean it. I've been working at the library for going on SEVEN YEARS now, and men? they read CRAP. You see a guy trolling the New Fiction shelves and ask if you can recommend something for him? He'll say "I was looking for something like Lincoln Child." Your friend introduces you to a dad from school and she tells him, "She's a librarian, she can tell you a good book to read," and he'll say, "Oh good! I really liked The Last Templar."

And hey, I do not begrudge a person their crap. Crap can be a soothing, entertaining part of life. But I find it mind-boggling that so many men can so unselfconsciously consume nothing but crap.

You ask fifty different women, "What was the last thing you read that you really liked?" and you'll get a couple repeats of The Help, but by and large it will be an eclectic list, ranging from high- to lowbrow, sampling genres, with a surprising amount of nonfiction represented. You ask the same thing of 50 men, and I guaran-goddamn-tee a narrower result. Lots of thrillers, some nonfiction.

In most cases, they don't even know it's crap. But go ahead and try to interest one of these guys in David Peace or Colum McCann or Marcel Theroux - any Theroux, for that matter - and they're just not going to bite.




There’s very little advice in men’s magazines, because men don’t think there’s a
lot they don’t know. Women do. Women want to learn. Men think, “I know what I’m
doing, just show me somebody naked.”

I did not say that. Jerry Seinfeld said that, and if Jerry Seinfeld said it, you can bet that it is as obvious a truth as the fact that most people have two feet. "What's the deal with that?"


And women don't read the kind of crap I'm talking about, hardly ever. Maybe Daniel Silva. The Kellermans. But most women do not end up in the checkout line with books by members of the All-Caps Squad under their arms.

It's the men. W.E.B. Griffin (Under Fire, Secret Honor) would be running a paintball range if it weren't for men. Actually, if it weren't for men, he wouldn't be doing that either. Brad Thor (Blowback, Takedown) would be a porn star. Harlan Coben (One False Move, Hold Tight) would be coaching high school football and getting sued by the parents of injured players if men didn't put their brains on hold and let their eyeballs plow through these fields of crap.

Nelson DeMille (Wild Fire, Upcountry)? I assume that's a pseudonym. If there were no Nelson DeMille, Cormac McCarthy would have nothing to do between thinking up ways to torture the characters in the novels that he admits to writing.




Cormac McCarthy and the Coen Brothers.


This is why Your Neighborhood Librarian is anonymous. Those guys (the authors, not the Coens) would murder me. Or just write me into a novel as the snobbish harpy at the reference desk who's probably a lesbian. A man-hating lesbian, my friend 'Librarian' is a Euphemism for What?! clarifies for me, and she is right.


What's amazing is that when you Google "Books men like" you get lists by Esquire magazine, Oprah, and the authors of The Art of Manliness, among others, suggesting that men like Hemingway, biographies of athletes, and John Dos Passos.

Yeah. SOME men read Dos Passos. Literature majors who are men have read John Dos Passos. Guys who live in rehabbed Craftsman bungalows have Dos Passos on their shelf. But the guy on the plane next to you? He's reading Stuart Woods.

You may notice that I have only just begun to qualify my outrageous opening statement. "Some men read Dos Passos." Of course, some men do not read crap. Some men read nonfiction that is relevant to their job or interests. Some men are Andrei "I'll never read that awful book" Codrescu. (Andrei Codrescu YOU ARE MY HERO.)




POET, TRAVELER, HERO.



My husband, famously, reads nothing but Sports Illustrated and The Economist. But I have a sneaking suspicion, given his (no longer quite so) secret feelings about Matt Damon (sorry honey), that, were I to bring home a Robert Ludlum novel, Jason Bourne would be his seatmate on the plane until he died or Ludlum's ghost stopped publishing books, whichever came first.


The whole thing is weird. Because, in addition to these amazingly unhelpful lists online, there's this survey that just came out, the VIDA Count (of literature reviewed in popular journals broken down by gender), which seems to suggest that unless a work of literary fiction is read by men, it is not taken seriously.

WTF, man. The EIGHT men who regularly read Don DeLillo and Jonathan Safran Foer as they sit in Ozzie's Coffee and Tea in Park Slope are ruining things for the likes of Amy Hempel and Mona Simpson? NOT FAIR. Mona, trek down from the Upper West and smack those boys.

It must be them. Because it's not your uncle, your brother in law, or your dentist who are preferring Dan Chaon to Marcy Dermansky. Dan's name might be in all caps on the cover, but those caps are NOT BOLD ENOUGH for your dentist. Look:



This is a book for men.



This is a book for women, former film majors, and men who flip through the Crate & Barrel catalog when it comes. God bless 'em.


Again:


Drama and action.



The word "internal" comes to mind.



BIG BOLD CAPS + CAR IN POOL = LOOK OUT



And women read crap, we do. SOME women read crap. Everybody likes some crap now and then. TinkerCinderBellaHontas reads the Sookie Stackhouse novels. The Baking Librarian swears by Jayne Ann Krentz. I read the Dexter books by Jeff Lindsay. The romance novel industry is going great guns right now, with spectacular sub-genres: Christian romance, erotic romance, Western romance, fantasy/SF romance (love that zero-grav humping!). BISEXUAL REGENCY EROTIC ROMANCE. I am so proud that the author of that book is a personal friend of mine.

Many women are gobbling up YA novels nowadays, and I think it's because they have an appetite for the elements of crap - fast pace, snappy dialogue, lots of action - but no taste for actual crap. Many of my friends who read YA have tried Laurell K. Hamilton - paranormal action crap ostensibly For Women - and tossed it aside with a grimace. The writing, she is not so good.


Once free of the lobby, the crowd flowed towards the different aisles like water searching for the quickest route downstream. The quickest route was still pretty slow. I dug the tickets out of the pocket of my suit jacket. I didn’t have a purse. There was a small brush, a lipstick, lipliner, eye shadow, ID, and my car keys stuffed in my coat pockets. My beeper was tucked in the front of my skirt, discreetly to one side. When not dressed up, I wore a fanny pack.

Or maybe my friends just refuse to accept the idea of a badass vampire hunter wearing a fanny pack.


Speaking of TinkerCinderBellaHontas, it was she who insisted that Bob and I start watching Castle, the Filliontastic TV show about an author of crap who falls in with a skinny police detective, a dead ringer for my friend The Meanest Cop in Ann Arundel County. Amusingly, the fictional novelist sits down to play poker with real-life crapslingers Stephen J. Cannell, Michael Connelly, and industry-unto-himself James Patterson. Less amusingly, Castle's fans are depicted as women. Women lining up to get his books signed, women attending his release parties. Even the pantsuited police detective is a devoted reader.

Crap! This is crap! Castle's readers would be men! Look at this actual quote from Nathan Actual Fillion: "I often say that Castle is Moonlighting meets Murder She Wrote having not really remembered Moonlighting and never having actually seen Murder She Wrote."

Those shows - and Castle - are Women's Crap. Richard Castle is Men's Crap.


"Pretend to write, Nathan." "How 'bout if I just sit here and try to look kind of stupid?" "Love it, perfect!"

I have obviously been fretting over this for months. When it comes to reading, women come in all shapes and sizes. You have Book Club Readers, Mystery Ladies, the I'll Try Anything Once type, Weepie Women, Memoir Moms, McSweeney's Groupies, and tons more. But men are so much more predictable. Why is this? If I had an answer, I'd be proposing this article to Harper's, and not just running my mouth on my blog.

Which I'm done doing, for now. Go in peace.

6 comments:

  1. "Many women are gobbling up YA novels nowadays, and I think it's because they have an appetite for the elements of crap - fast pace, snappy dialogue, lots of action - but no taste for actual crap."

    This is smart.

    But mostly I'm stunned that you got through a whole post about the crap that women read vs. men without ever mentioning Nicholas Sparks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. LOL! Nico-wha? Who? I seem to have erected a total mental gulag around that guy. His name literally never passes through my mind, and the fact that I just now noticed that must be evidence.

    Both genders read him, though, isn't that right? And young people too? Him and Thomas Kinkade, Novelist of Light: they'll get their own rants!

    :p

    ReplyDelete
  3. You mentioned Thomas Kinkade, Painter of Blight, in your comment, so now I love you.

    This is a well-written and funny post. What disturbs me about my husband is that he does not read crap. He reads non-fiction histories, but not like the history of Chairman Mao or Andrew Jackson. He reads Blowback and Gnome Chomsky and books about Republicans doing sneaky, underhanded things (which is everything they do besides breathing, and even then...). And he reads Nietzsche. Over and over again.

    As for me, my reading is so sporadic anymore now that I have such a short attention span. But I can hardly bear a novel; the last one I read was the one about Lemon Cake last summer. Real life is so much more important to me: Mary Roach, Michael Pollan, even that nappy-headed Malcolm Gladwell. Not my real life, but someone is having fun.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The gist of this article (which I enjoyed immensely) is that men have limited crap tastes while women have diverse crap tastes. I beg to differ.

    I haven't read most of the male crap authors you mentioned, but there is a lot of range in thriller writing. The manly-man, high-testosterone stuff by Clancy, Cussler, and others is what most people think of as "guy books," but I find that stuff insufferable, and it's just one segment of the thriller genre.

    I've read all of Michael Crichton's books and loved them. He is arguably the inventor of the high-tech thriller and, in my opinion, a terrific writer. I also enjoy the medical thrillers, although Robin Cook can be pretty pedestrian. Then there's political fiction, by Brad Meltzer (a very snappy writer), David Baldacci, and so forth. Some legal thrillers are very engaging; Grisham is the one everybody knows, but I think Phillip Margolin is way better. I could go on like this. You'd probably say, oh, all that stuff is basically the same, but it really isn't.

    Now, you talk about all of the wonderful sub-genres in romance writing. From where I sit, that stuff looks interchangeable. The covers look the same; the titles sound the same. And I know LOTS of women who scarf down mountains of those books and are barely aware that other kinds of fiction exist.

    I'm not suggesting that thrillers are better than chick lit or vice versa. But your thesis that men's crap lit is all cut from the same cloth while women's reading habits are delightfully diverse just sounds like a matter of perspective to me. It's like a rock music fan saying that all classical music sounds the same, or vice versa.

    Incidentally, I'm a librarian (cataloger at a university library) so I'm not oblivious to highbrow fiction.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well, Anonymous, you're probably right. I haven't read most of those mens' authors either. But the frequency with which they put out books makes me suspicious of their quality.

    I can only say what I've observed helping adults find leisure reading for going on 7 years - men are generally really predictable, and women will, as often as not, surprise you. A woman may look like a total Nora Roberts type, but it'll turn out she's looking for gruesome, kinky murder.

    But when I ask a man if he needs any help finding what he's looking for, 80% of the time, he's looking for Grippando or Baldacci.

    That's all, really.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just found your blog. Nice stuff. Funny, intriguing, and for some reason I really love the fishbones.

    ReplyDelete